I do not blog but I felt compelled to write the following personal essay for your perusal if you have the time-
Those that I became close enough
friends with in college, as well as many others, know that I developed two deep
and equal passions during those years: Balls and Keeping It Down.
Throughout the ten-plus years that have since gone
by, numerous concerned friends have pushed and prodded me to expand my
interests. But they learned: with frustration and some dismay; followed by
acceptance; followed by amusement—
that I am a man of persistence and conviction.
I hereby want to make those college friends, and
all other friends, family and acquaintances aware that while I will be
retaining these enduring passions from this day until my last, a fruition of
three new interests has ripened within me in the past year, one of which I just
identified this past week.
Let there be no doubt in you that I feel a sense of
concern in embarking on the pursuit of more than twice as many interests as
have kept me so occupied and fulfilled in the last decade passed. Uncertain, I
am, as to whether I will be able to dedicate the proper time and resources to
juggling this much. After all, I’m merely one man. But alas, one should not
turn one’s back on one’s interests.
Without further precursors, I’d like to share my
three new passions, ordered by ever so slightly increasing zeal: #spicerfacts;
#conwaypivots; and #trumpduplicities. I trust these interests can be grasped or
investigated without need for my description.
This social circle announcement now disclosed, I
confess that like many others of late, excessive time consumption from
facebooking has been burdensome, especially as I work to integrate a balance of
my new interests into my schedule. And thus, though I will by no means be
vanishing from your timelines, I do intend to re-allocate some amount of my
election/policy-induced facebook time in order to properly manage the rigors of
such an aggressive new array of passions.
I will indeed decidedly continue to distribute
facebook posts relating to political discourse and government policy changes
that I deem of high importance or comedic value. And not only is humorous or
agreeable/neutral commentary welcome, but should you find yourself in
disagreement or contention with the nature of any humor, importance, or
hypocrisy regarding any such posts, then I enthusiastically encourage, with
maximum degree of sincerity, that you demonstrate balls by stating your thoughts
or posing a question to me, instead of keeping it down. For one would hope that
such actions' results would be an elevation of mutual understanding toward each other- a worthy outcome for such investment.
But that proposition now out there — please, pretty-please,
with real, fresh Godiva chocolate covered cherries on top — be
confident in yourself that you are armed with relevant purpose and knowledge or
inquisitiveness. For as I stated earlier, I am a man of persistence and
conviction; please seek to avoid being on the receiving end of a hashtag
pertaining to one of my newest interests. And be forewarned. I’m not a woman.
But I am nasty.
Not nasty
for any merit inherent within nastiness itself- for there is none. But nasty
should the nature of a comment received be deficient in any of the following:
relevance; accuracy; importance; tone; and clarity and degree of implied underlying purpose. Deficient
relevance and/or importance of a comment warrants some nastiness as retaliation
for the crime(s) of wastefully expending the time and thinking of those reading
and contemplating a comment of such nature. Deficiency in implied underlying purpose, tone and/or
accuracy warrants some level of greater nastiness as retaliation for the
greater crime(s) of lowering human character expectations, inciting anger,
and/or falsifying or obscuring reality which proliferates misinformation within
society. High relevance and pragmatism with strong purpose and tone is of
course laudable and calls for agreement or a rebuttal in kind.
I encourage you to consciously decide on and
embrace your own personal policy of some similar nature should you want to
share important news stories but confront dread that you'd possibly have to
deal with critics and detractors or feel an understandable insecurity in
putting "out there" what you deem important. Remember that for
someone to make any unreasonable negative assumptions about your core character
based on something you decide to share, the shame is on them, especially since
they know you on some personal level- and from those whose reactions you should
care about most because they are the people in your life you care about most-
you deserve to expect that they will always be understanding and a source of constructive feedback if not the wind
beneath your wings of conviction.
Your wall is your virtual property; if you believe
something is important for others to be aware of, then is making them aware of
it what you should not do? Of course not. That makes no sense. Have confidence
in your ability to maintain the integrity of your virtual property according to
your own personal standards. You have the ability and utmost justification for
deleting commentary beneath your standards of relevant topical dialog. And so
too do you have the utmost justification for throwing down the nasty in you
when warranted.
If knowledge is power, then be a source of
empowerment to all you know when you believe it is called for.
Ignorance may be bliss but so too is it weakness— akin
to its spouse gullibility- and a sibling to poverty, resources' inaccessibility,
and incapacity to influence decisions that affect you.
And while the saying that “knowledge is power”
holds truth, it is actually misguiding. Other forms of power clearly exist. Yet
all other forms of power do not have an equivalent idiom. While people of
course know that wealth is another form of power, you won’t hear them use that
statement as an idiom. Likewise, you don’t hear people say “resource
accessibility is power” or “capacity to influence decisions is power.” Such
truths don’t make for good soundbites. The idiom regarding knowledge that I mentioned before, which
we hear thrown out there from time to time, should clearly be amended to
“knowledge is one form of power—” if not in our jargon, then at least within
our awareness of its more accurate truth.
The last argument I’d like to leave you with is
that social media is too powerful a platform for what I will coin as the
“spread-amount” of important and accurate information not to be shared in a proportion that
represents a multiple of the inevitable “spread-amount” of unimportant or
inaccurate information. We cannot afford for misguidance- on issues that affect so many people's livelihoods- to be so widespread as to pose what a reasonable person would view as a serious threat to so many.
And while I am advocating for greater social
engagement regarding issues of importance, for one to not recognize that
over-proliferation regarding such issues will inevitably cause what I will coin
“social-media news fatigue,” is to be a fool. In the same way that accurate and important news needs be more widespread than inaccurate and unimportant news, the proportion of shared facebook news people receive should not form too big a shadow over that of humor and happier content. The extent to which your social
audience will pay any attention to what you post is dependent primarily on the
importance to them of both the content that you post and who you are to them, but secondary factors clearly include
their personal time constraints and their tolerance for an overly excessive
volume of news relative to other content in their feeds. Be mindful.
The final and most important tidings I’d like to
offer is the following truth:
An existing reality of circumstances, whether
personal or societal, is best to be aware of so as to guide you in making
appropriate decisions, but never ever allow yourself to get perpetually
consumed by mulling over such realities. To the greatest extent you are able to
control your own mind, your thoughts should be on each existing moment, not the
past nor the future. Live within the present moment. And be a force for good within it
when such moments present themselves with the opportunity to do so.
"Why did one straw break the camel's back? Here's the secret- there's a million other straws underneath it." -Mos Def
If you find yourself agreeing with my arguments but needing further inspiration to take action, I offer you the outlet to one of my favorite songs of all time by my favorite performance artist of all time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8ajkPp75PQ
"Why did one straw break the camel's back? Here's the secret- there's a million other straws underneath it." -Mos Def
If you find yourself agreeing with my arguments but needing further inspiration to take action, I offer you the outlet to one of my favorite songs of all time by my favorite performance artist of all time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8ajkPp75PQ
No comments:
Post a Comment